5 Responses

  1. theblakefish
    theblakefish at |

    Can you tell us more on the seats/lounge/experience and less about the food….

  2. Wandering Aramean
    Wandering Aramean at |

    For the lounge part read the separate post about that here: http://blog.wandr.me/2011/01/across-the-pond-in-lufthansa-first-class-part-1-muc-first-class-lounge/.

    As for the seat, it is poor. Not awful but defintely not what I’d consider a proper F experience. The IFE is a cruddy 6″ screen and while the seat goes flat it is a bit bumpy due to where the various parts join up.

    The overall experience is pretty decent. It is definitely a noticable step above LH C but not so much better than some of the other C products out there. There are a number of little things that are neat, like fresh flowers and such, but those don’t make up for the other shortcomings IMO.

  3. dfyant
    dfyant at |

    I completely agree about the LH F seat being lumpy. I avoid LH only because of their uncomfy F seats. I actually converted to OW b/c of that.

  4. Best F product from BKK to W.Europe? - FlyerTalk Forums

    […] return on my recent TATL award and even the FCL in MUC (not the FCT, but I've done that, too) was enough to convince me that LH F is worth the upcharge. I'd take TG F over them in a heartbeat just based on the potential for it to be better. […]