XL Airways to "connect" New York City and Israel


XL Airways launched service to the United States in 2009 with the goal of significantly dropping fares between Paris and New York City. It succeeded on that front and nearly a decade and three more US destinations later has a new target market: Israel. For the Summer 2018 season the airline will sell connecting itineraries for the first time ever, allowing travelers to fly between New York and Tel Aviv, via Paris, on a single ticket. Passengers will also have the option to break up the trip with a stop in Paris at no extra charge.

The shift to add hub-like functionality is out of character for the true LCC market. As CEO Laurent Magnin noted during the announcement, “We need to be careful on one thing: A hub is costly. Always.” But, especially as the long-haul LCC market matures, that caution must be suppressed from time to time. Magnin believes that time is now and the NYC-Israel market is the perfect target.

It is not creating a hub. It is probably creating two or three flights with a connection. But the policy of the airline is not to say “no hub” but it is not to say “hub.” Some routes need to be explored.

XL Airways is not alone in that market, not by a long shot. Delta, EL AL and United Airlines offer multiple nonstop flights daily while the “big 3” legacy alliances offer plenty of connecting choices via hubs in Europe. On the LCC side WOW air also operates to Tel Aviv, with connections onward to multiple US gateways, including Newark. Magnin believes that XL Airways can still find a niche in that market, however, and drive a profitable traffic segment. And, perhaps, more importantly, he intimated that the carrier may eventually work to secure local traffic rights on the route if demand is sufficient (and the regulatory hurdles can be cleared), converting from the connecting traffic to a nonstop flight.

Read More: Beyond sound bites: Ryanair’s Michael O’Leary on the Future of European Aviation

The XL Airways Passenger Experience

When launching the XL brand Magnin had to choose between the “naked” LCC option where everything costs extra and a bundled model. The company offers at least one meal and one checked bag on every booking. Combined with what are typically lower starting prices he believes that the model can continue to be successful, especially for families and leisure travelers that are no longer in their 20s and just off on a quick trip, a demographic he sees as more keen for the “naked” LCC fares.

Thats a 9-abreast A330 layout on XL Airways, which is VERY tight. Still, the prices are generally low and lots of people are buying.
Thats a 9-abreast A330 layout on XL Airways, which is VERY tight. Still, the prices are generally low and lots of people are buying.

The flights are basic in service beyond the free meal, but there are innovative entertainment options available for passengers. The A330 fleet features the XL Cloud streaming IFE solution, powered by Immfly. Passengers can either use their own device or stream movies and TV shows to a rented iPad on board. The carrier offers a mix of free and paid/premium content on the system. The carrier also offers Skylights “immersive cinema goggles” for rent on board for those who want the 3D/VR experience.

Read More: Worldwide by EasyJet: Long-haul LCC partnership launches

Magnin also notes that more and more passengers are building DIY connections across multiple airlines. They’re aided by metasearch/booking engines such as SkyScanner that offer those trips (and the associated warnings) in search results. With more passengers already choosing such, plus the Worldwide by easyJet option now live, XL Airways has to adjust its approach to the market to keep pace. Managing to do so while also controlling costs and fares charged is a challenge, but given


Never miss another post: Sign up for email alerts and get only the content you want direct to your inbox.

Seth Miller

I'm Seth, also known as the Wandering Aramean. I was bit by the travel bug 30 years ago and there's no sign of a cure. I fly ~200,000 miles annually; these are my stories. You can connect with me on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.


  1. i’m no DL fan but they also fly JFK-TLV, albeit at the lowest capacity and frequency among EL AL, UA, and DL.

  2. @askmrlee a year or so ago 9 a cross and 17″ would have had XL in a bad sit , however UA uses its 773 on the night flights to TLV 10 across and 17.1 So XL isnt out of line unfortunately. The unknown is the pitch most carriers into TLV is 31″ in reg Y

    OT 1 reason I moved my Asian trips away from UA is all too often its their 773 or 772(UA) where its 10 across and 17.1 Ouch, So even thou theres more pitch to E+ its still 10 across and 17.1 not for me

    If XL prices it right I can see them getting the biz as many folks would prefer the shorter trip via Paris (and maybe a stop over to boot) over Aeroflot or former USSR countrys carriers that adds needless hours to the trip, or Turkish for that matter.

    1. Yup…United’s 10-abreast 777s are tight (only 77W and domestic 772s so far, but the 772s int’l are coming soon enough). So are the 9-abreast 787s. And both of those layouts are flown by many carriers today (with more coming soon). The squeeze in the back of the plane sucks, but people keep buying the tickets and, especially this year more than most, the legacy carriers are choosing to go higher density and lower fares rather than try to convince pax to pay a higher fare. As XL’s CEO notes, when the choice comes to paying $800 extra for an 8 hour flight or for 8 nights in a hotel many folks seem to choose the hotel for the splurge (or to save the cash) and fly the cheaper seats.

  3. Thanks for sharing this update, seems LCC on long haul is a viable alternative to the traditional offering. Regards, Alastair Majury

Comments are closed.