5 Responses

  1. Rob
    Rob at |

    Seth: I’m a full time lobbyist in DC. It’s shocking to see the army of lobbyists that the US3 are paying to spread their misinformation.

  2. Trevor
    Trevor at |

    I think you put a great point on it, Seth. The amount of money being spent on this, right, wrong, misguided, or otherwise, is money that could be used for better purposes, ultimately better for passengers, as well as shareholders.

    Of the money that is being spent though, it has sounded to me from the beginning, like the US3 created this argument after a few too many adult beverages, without having it properly murderboarded. I mean, just as you say – the US Government can’t help them without significant loss in position. The only logical approach I can think of, is that the US3 are demanding a lot in hopes for some compromise, however, given the lack of thinking in the arguments, I feel like that may be giving them too much credit.

  3. Is this Airline Collusion in the USA?

    […] meeting got to being exciting or interesting was when Akbar Al Baker called out the US3 for their Open Skies/Subsidy claims being a threat to global aviation or, perhaps, when IATA tried to introduce new carry-on baggage […]

  4. Who's "happy to reinvent [the cause] to suit whatever argument it may be making at a given time?" - Points with a Crew

    […] Etihad and Qatar).  Emirates recently released a response to the subsidy claim report, and the Wandering Aramean shares an analysis.  My favorite quote was “Delta evidently is happy to reinvent the alleged cause of the […]

  5. Delta invests in China Eastern - Wandering Aramean

    […] In which Emirates takes the US3 to task over subsidy claims […]