Delta ties elite status to spend


The shift towards revenue as the defining characteristic for loyalty value is picking up speed. Several smaller carriers have made the shift over the past couple years and now a major US airline is joining the efforts. Delta has announced that stating with their 2015 Medallion program year the carrier will require a minimum spend in addition to flight thresholds for passengers to acquire elite status.

image

The good news is that the details of the requirement – essentially 10 cents per mile – are being published well in advance of the requirements kicking in. The spend will be a factor for earning status in 2014 towards the 2015 program year. Members of the SkyMiles program have plenty of time to figure out if it still works for them and, if not, to figure out their next move. And I’m guessing not so many will be making a move.

For most passengers, the spend requirements probably aren’t all that bad. The price point is actually below the overall average fare price for tickets across Delta’s system. In other worlds, passengers who have Medallion status for less spend than that are below average in revenue to the company. It isn’t hard to understand why Delta would not want to reward those customers as much as the above average spenders. And the whole point of the loyalty programs is to reward your best customers, right?

The 10 cents per mile requirement will have many up in arms, particularly in the points & miles community. The discussions online have been rather exciting since the rumors of this change started swirling and they haven’t calmed down since the official announcement today. For customers focused on getting as much value as possible for the minimum amount invested this move is pretty much the end of the road.

It is also worth noting that customers spending at least $25k on a co-branded American Express credit card will have the spend requirement waived. Not necessarily because Delta realizes the same revenue from the CC spend but the cost of servicing that is rather lower, meaning the margins are in favor of the CC customers.

There are plenty of problems with the accounting scheme. Most of them come from not counting spend on partner travel (I don’t see only counting base fare as a problem) and setting themselves up for some very strange rollover miles situations. But the big picture of the new plan is reasonably well structured. That doesn’t mean it is great for all customers, but it is great for the ones the company wants to reward.

In reading around the webs on the change I was quite surprised to see Gary over at View From the Wing say, “I like marrying a minimum spend level with miles flown.” That’s a big change in stance and one I hadn’t expected. Personally I’ve always wondered why the airlines didn’t go this route. I know it isn’t good for me personally as a customer given my spend patterns, but I also know that I’m not the right customer for the airlines. Yet somehow they keep rewarding me.

It is simply a matter of time now before the other major carriers make their moves in response to Delta’s. It will certainly be interesting to watch this play out.

Never miss another post: Sign up for email alerts and get only the content you want direct to your inbox.


Seth Miller

I'm Seth, also known as the Wandering Aramean. I was bit by the travel bug 30 years ago and there's no sign of a cure. I fly ~200,000 miles annually; these are my stories. You can connect with me on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and .

8 Comments

  1. I am not sure that this really changes anything for many people in the Delta M&P community. Those that fall below the threshold due to MRing might shift a lot of spend to the Delta card… Or create fake spend.

  2. Unless they are already pushing the $25K in spend through the AmEx cards then shifting it there represents an opportunity cost that is probably not worth it. And the CC has its own costs and considerations.

    Yes, Delta left an “out” for people, but it is still a rather significant move in shifting the market.

  3. It doesn’t really matter if you meet minimum spend requirements if you can no longer meet MQM requirements due to the catastrophic devaluation of the partner earning chart. I really see these changes as highly detrimental to the program. Oh, for the days of six major US carriers battling it out.

  4. The partner earnin changes are just more of the same. The company wants to reward passengers who are profitable to them. Flying on partners doesn’t meet that criteria. I think that the lack o a carve-out for joint venture flights is a mistake but otherwise I see it as a smart business move. Not necessarily going to make all customers happy, but that’s not what business is about.

  5. Watch out for some announcements with *A this year too, its in the work since >6 months. The Starnet FFP database is almost done upgrading to track the actual spend per coupon reported into the database.

  6. Even if they want to encourage people flying their own metal, the spend should be calculated as such :

    100% if own metal or JV routes
    75% if JV partners but non-Jv-routes or code shared
    50% if intra-alliance partner

    The loophole I see if That they could force a totally unrelated ticket to 006 stock

  7. I’ve actually given this a good deal of thought over the past many months. I don’t think total revenue is the right way for an airline to value a frequent flyer for its own bottom line. But total miles flown isn’t inherently right either.

    To be clear, I like marrying spend and miles flown COMPARED TO JUST SPEND.

    And I’m not saying this is the right level of spend (or that 100k or 125k is the right number of miles).

    But it’s not at all unreasonable to say “we won’t award Diamond status to a customer spending less than $3000.” Is $12.5k the right number? or $25k? I don’t have a strong claim there although I am guessing it’s not $25k.

Comments are closed.

BoardingArea